The Lascar Group and the Strong Types of Hyperimaginaries
نویسنده
چکیده
This is an expository note on the Lascar group. We also study the Lascar group over hyperimaginaries, and make some new observations on the strong types over those. In particular we show that in a simple theory, Ltp ≡ stp in real context implies that for hyperimaginary context. The Lascar group introduced by Lascar [8], and related subjects have been studied by many authors ([9][1][7][6][3] and more). Notably in [9][1], a new look on the Lascar group is given, and using compact Lie group theory Lascar and Pillay proved that any bounded hyperimaginary is interdefinable with a sequence of finitary bounded hyperimaginaries. Good summaries on the Lascar group are written in [10][11]. While this is another short expository note stating known results in [8][9][1][7], we supply a couple of new observations. We study the Lascar group in slightly more general context namely over hyperimaginaries. The notion of strong types over hyperimaginaries is somewhat subtler even at the level of the definition (see Example 3.5). As a by-product we show that in a simple theory if Ltp(a/A) ≡ stp(a/A) for real tuples a and A, then the same holds for hyperimaginaries. A question remains whether this holds in any theory. We work with an arbitrary complete theory T in L, and a fixed large saturated model M |= T of size κ̄, as usual. We recall some of definitions. Unless said otherwise a tuple can have an infinite size (< κ̄). By a hyperimaginary we mean an equivalence class of a typedefinable equivalence relation over ∅. So a hyperimaginary has the form a/E = aE where a is a tuple fromM and E(x, y) is the ∅-type-definable equivalence relation on M|x|. We call aE an E-hyperimaginary. We say the hyperimaginary is finitary if a is a finite tuple. In general we put |aE| := |a|. In the note arity means an arity of a real tuple. From now on a, b, c, ..., A,B, ... denote hyperimaginaries, but M,N, .. denote elementary small submodels of M. Clearly any tuple from This is a note submitted for the proceedings of the conference: Recent developments in model theory, Oléron, France, June 2011, where the author gave a talk on different subjects in [4],[5]. This work is supported by an NRF grant 2010-0016044.
منابع مشابه
Hyperimaginaries and Automorphism Groups
A hyperimaginary is an equivalence class of a type-definable equivalence relation on tuples of possibly infinite length. The notion was recently introduced in [?], mainly with reference to simple theories. It was pointed out there how hyperimaginaries still remain in a sense within the domain of first order logic. In this paper we are concerned with several issues: on the one hand, various leve...
متن کاملSuperstrong Is Strong Enough
A supersimple theory eliminates hyperimaginaries. In particular, in a supersimple theory Lascar strong type is the same as strong type, and every strong type has a canonical base in C . It follows that the Amalgamation Theorem (Independence Theorem) holds for types over algebraically closed sets.
متن کاملSimplicity, and Stability in There
Firstly, in this paper, we prove that the equivalence of simplicity and the symmetry of forking. Secondly, we attempt to recover deenability part of stability theory to simplicity theory. In particular, using elimination of hyperimaginaries we prove that for any supersimple T , canonical base of an amalgamation class P is the union of names of-deenitions of P, ranging over stationary L-formulas...
متن کاملIntroduction to the Lascar Group
The aim of this article is to give a short introduction to the Lascar Galois group GalL(T ) of a complete first order theory T . We prove that GalL(T ) is a quasicompact topological group in section 5. GalL(T ) has two canonical normal closed subgroups: Γ1(T ), the topological closure of the identity, and GalL(T ), the connected component. In section 6 we characterize these two groups by the wa...
متن کاملBorel equivalence relations and Lascar strong types
The “space” of Lascar strong types, on some sort and relative to a given complete theory T , is in general not a compact Hausdorff topological space. We have at least three (modest) aims in this paper. The first is to show that spaces of Lascar strong types, as well as other related spaces and objects such as the Lascar group GalL(T ) of T , have well-defined Borel cardinalities (in the sense o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
دوره 54 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013